The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2042 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
So, you have seen the number of appeals being rejected on that ground going down through the new steps that have been taken.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Presumably, as a consequence of that, you are satisfied that people being kicked out because they do not know whether to put their full name or half of their name is not a barrier to appeals.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Emma, do you want to follow up?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I want to make my last point sensitively, harking back to your initial comments about your brilliant staff and the quality of your staff. One thing that jumped out from the report was ill-health absence. You are a very small team, so even one or two absences are reflected very strongly in percentage figures. However, you are adrift of the Office for National Statistics benchmark on total days lost through ill-health absence, which I know will concern you.
Is there anything that would assist with that in the short term? If this committee were to make recommendations about the report, is there anything that would help you with that? The absences seem to have a much bigger impact than they perhaps would in larger organisations.
10:00
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I want to come in with some questions about appeals. Would it be useful for the public if there were a dashboard that indicated the number of cases that are readily available to read—not to put people off, but so that, if they come on to the website, they can see the volume? It might assist you in pointing out how challenging it is to deal with requests, given the approaches that other bodies take to them. Might it be useful if that data were more readily available?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Excellent.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
In essence, rather than just coming to the end of it, you are beyond the resilience element of being able to cope with changes, because of the lean nature of the organisation, the level of efficiencies that you are trying to achieve, and the very small team. Actually, the flipside is the pressure of the work when the team is interacting with members of the public who, as you indicated earlier, range from people who are saying, “I just do not really understand this,” all the way through to people who are raising much more complex issues that go above and beyond freedom of information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Good morning and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2026 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
Our first agenda item is consideration of whether to take item 5, which is consideration of the evidence that we will hear from the Scottish Information Commissioner, in private. Are members content to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I have one question, by way of clarification. If I understand it correctly, three parties are involved: the trustees of the pension, who initially identified a potential problem; the Parliament, which is represented by the corporate body, and which takes responsibility for the payments; and the Scottish Government, which has brought forward this legislation. The committee therefore needs to know that a number of people are satisfied that the proposals will resolve a problem, which seems to have been missed until slightly late in the day.
We have received correspondence from the chief executive confirming that the corporate body is satisfied. Obviously, we also understand that the Scottish Government is satisfied. Are you able to confirm, minister, that the pension trustees are also satisfied with the proposal—or is it the case that, now that the issues have been identified and will be put right, their processes can go ahead under the changed rules after 7 May without any difficulty?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for your response with regard to my question about the pension trustees.
The committee acknowledges the position that we are in. As is always the case, it would have been useful to have spotted the problem before it became a problem. Lessons can be learned from that.
I have no further questions, and committee members also have no further questions. I am therefore content to turn to agenda item 3 and the debate on motion S6M-20792. As members will be aware, only the minister and members can speak during any debate on the motion.
I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Act 2025 (Consequential Provision) Regulations 2026 be approved. —[Graeme Dey].
Motion agreed to.
09:05
Meeting suspended.
09:08
On resuming—