The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 47 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:As Fergus Ewing said, this is a much bigger issue. The amending of digital material is widespread. The BBC and other organisations that are supposed to be above reproach have altered digital material—the Donald Trump thing comes to mind. It is perhaps too big an issue for this committee can deal with. It requires a full review.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:As Fergus Ewing said, this is a much bigger issue. The amending of digital material is widespread. The BBC and other organisations that are supposed to be above reproach have altered digital material—the Donald Trump thing comes to mind. It is perhaps too big an issue for this committee can deal with. It requires a full review.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
In light of the moves that the Scottish Government has made, I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that certain categories of asylum seekers are already eligible to access the statutory national concessionary travel scheme and the Scottish Government has suggested that any long-term actions to extend the scheme to all asylum seekers will depend on the evaluation of the pilot that is currently under way.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity to highlight our concerns regarding the lack of clarity on whether concessionary travel will be available to all asylum seekers beyond March 2026. The committee could also highlight the option for the petitioners to submit an updated petition in the next parliamentary session, should they consider that the Scottish Government’s actions on the matter are not sufficient.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:It is quite a complex matter. As well as Scottish Water and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, other agencies, such as planning authorities, are involved. I was quite involved with the issue when I worked in Glasgow, because it overlaps with other issues. Brock burn and the River Cart originate in the hills of East Renfrewshire, which is where the convener’s constituency is.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:That is because of the £10 million that I spent on upgrading the lower downstream.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:Reasonable flood risk management plans are in place there, but they are a bit out of date because there has been much more rain in recent years. That is the real crux of the matter. The plans were probably just about fit for purpose, but the weather has slightly changed now. Previously, there would be a flood once in 100 years; now, there is about one in 30 years—perhaps it is even more frequent than that in some areas. It is quite a big exercise, but the approach needs to be focused rather than broad.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Davy Russell
I used to be responsible for this sort of thing in a former life, and what I would say is that this happens not just at the schools themselves. It happens for about half a mile on either side of them, given that a lot of children are part of the safer routes to school programme and are walking to school.
Other traffic-calming measures tend to be more effective than speed cameras, because drivers will speed up to the cameras, slow down once they know where they are, and then speed away again. There are numerous other measures such as sleeping policemen, chicanes and so on—you name it—that are probably more effective than speed cameras.
Cameras are tools that can be used in certain instances, but there are other traffic-calming measures that the police do not need to be consulted on, and which the roads authority, or whatever council it is, can put in place. If people want a speed camera to be put in, they need to consult and get agreement from the police authority. It might be easier for the petitioner to speak to his local authority and ask for an assessment of other traffic-calming measures.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Davy Russell
I have had a fair bit of correspondence from young mums about the issue. It is so difficult to get childcare, especially when a child is aged between nine months and three years. The cost and sometimes the locality—I have a big rural area in my constituency—are stopping parents from getting childcare, which prevents them from going back to work. If they went back to work, the financial cost of getting the childcare that their child deserves would far outweigh the financial benefits of going back to work. It is a big issue, and I have three or four current cases because of it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Davy Russell
This is still one of the most commonsense suggestions. Local communities that have wind farms and even solar on their doorstep have to suffer the consequences, whether it is to scenic views or whatever, so I agree that they should have a say in what happens and a share of the profits.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Another thing is Police Scotland’s involvement, since the detainees are held on their premises. It might be worth while—