Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1189 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:Although I usually recommend shutting petitions down, I recommend to the committee that we keep this petition open, as there are several areas that the new committee would be justified in exploring in the new parliamentary session. Can we keep the petition open and put it in our legacy report, so that whoever is on the next committee in the next session can take it forward and explore the issues?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:I think that progress has been made on the petition. Given the limited time that is left in the parliamentary session, I invite the committee to consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has funded the FND care pathway and has suggested that several other measures have been, or are being, taken to improve awareness of FND; that NHS boards are responsible for planning and delivering local services and have a duty to involve communities in decisions regarding service delivery; and that individual clinicians are responsible for referring people with FND to appropriate resources.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:In the light of the evidence that the committee has received, I suggest that we consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government’s position is that abolishing the GTCS is neither desirable nor proportionate; the GTCS has published its action plan for implementing the recommendations of the PSA’s report, which include a range of short, medium and long-term measures; and the GTCS expects to consult on updated fitness-to-teach rules, with a view to publishing those in spring 2028.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:Yes.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:In light of the Government’s pretty strong response, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that: the final islands connectivity plan strategic approach, which was published in May, did not include concessionary ferry travel for over-60s; the Scottish Government does not believe that it is affordable to expand ferry concessions to over-60s; and the Scottish Government has been clear that it does not plan to take forward any further action in that area.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has highlighted a range of measures and programmes that are already in place that address the petition’s main aims, and the limited time that is left in the current parliamentary session means that the committee is unable to pursue further meaningful action on the petition.

In closing the petition, the committee could highlight to the petitioner the option to submit a new petition in the next parliamentary session, should she consider that insufficient action is being taken on the matter.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:I wonder whether the committee should consider passing the matter on to the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, which is currently working on food standards.

10:45

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:In the light of the evidence before us and the Government taking on board the petition, I wonder whether we can close the petition on the basis that Food Standards Scotland’s advice—now I am on the wrong petition; I apologise. Food Standards Scotland intends to explore what scope there might be to include statements or warnings about non-food allergens on packaging and will discuss options for packaging-based consumer protection measures with its counterparts in the UK Government, highlighting the points that are raised in the petition. I say to the petitioner that, if that does not happen or if there is no progress, they could lodge a new petition with the petitions committee in the new parliamentary session.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:In the light of the time that the committee has left, it would be beneficial for us to close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders. That would allow the petitioner to bring a fresh petition straight back to Parliament in the next session.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 February 2026

David Torrance

:In the light of the evidence before us and the Government taking on board the petition, I wonder whether we can close the petition on the basis that Food Standards Scotland’s advice—now I am on the wrong petition; I apologise. Food Standards Scotland intends to explore what scope there might be to include statements or warnings about non-food allergens on packaging and will discuss options for packaging-based consumer protection measures with its counterparts in the UK Government, highlighting the points that are raised in the petition. I say to the petitioner that, if that does not happen or if there is no progress, they could lodge a new petition with the petitions committee in the new parliamentary session.