The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1391 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Good morning. You probably heard the questions that I put to the previous panel. I would like to hear your views on the process that the bill proposes for withdrawal from RO and RME. There are three aspects of that process, the first of which is the requirement for schools to inform a child if their parent asks for them to be withdrawn from RO or RME. Secondly, when a request has been made, the child will be given an opportunity to express their views, and the school must seek to have a discussion with the child and the parent if the child objects to being withdrawn. Thirdly, the school must respect the child’s wishes if their view differs from that of their parent. Previous witnesses raised the issue of the age and maturity of the pupil, which they thought was important, although their views differed.
I am particularly interested in hearing a legal perspective. Who would like to go first?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you for that. Angela O’Hagan was nodding away there. Angela, do you want to add anything else on the UNCRC point and the general question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Rachel Fox, do you have anything to add on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
That really strengthens the point that was made earlier on; you put across a very good point. I do not know whether anybody wants to add to that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Let us move on to part 2 of the bill, which introduces an exemption for a situation in which a public authority is compelled to act incompatibly with the UNCRC’s requirements. What is your view of the Scottish Government’s reasoning for including the further exemption to the compatibility duty? The witnesses have partly answered that question. I do not know whether anyone wants to add anything specifically about the compatibility duty and part 2 of the bill.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Fraser, I will come to you first. We have talked about rights under the UNCRC, the compatibility duty in the bill, and the Scottish Government’s reasoning for the further exemption from that duty in part 2 of the bill. You have touched on that already. Do you have anything to add on that point?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Alejandro, do you have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
You have all touched on the UNCRC. I know that the UNCRC provisions are in part 2, but it is relevant to the other question that I asked, too. Does anyone else want to come in and pick up the UNCRC point specifically? We heard about that from witnesses on the previous two panels.
I ask Caitlin Fitzgerald to respond specifically on the UNCRC point and on the general question as well. Angela O’Hagan can come in, too. It seems to be a rolling theme in all our evidence sessions so far.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
My apologies for being late, convener—I was stuck in an accident this morning.
Some of the debate has been around disabled pupils and pupils with complex needs, and those who are care experienced. Is the balance right in the bill, or should there be more specific guidance on specific aspects—for example, relating to those with care experience?
As members, we have probably all dealt with casework on these issues and heard parents talking about them. In your view, should there be specific guidance on the different areas where restraint and seclusion might be applicable?
I will come to Kate Sanger first, as I know that she has particular expertise in this area. Kate, what are your thoughts on that point?