Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1571 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

I will bring in Nicola Guild to answer that. It would not be written off, but I think that any further action would be determined by the procurator fiscal. Is that correct, Nicola?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

No—that is not a reason why we should not increase the penalties.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

No, there is not.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

It would be up to the police to determine, in accordance with the Lord Advocate’s guidelines, but my understanding is that the police would still be called and the person could still be charged. The police might simply not be able to give a fixed-penalty notice.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

First, it is not being raised so as to be a deterrent.

We accept that there is sensitivity about the £70 penalty level and that some people could perceive that the increase does not go far enough. Because the legislation has not been updated for more than 20 years, we are just bringing the level up to account for inflation. As we move into the next parliamentary session, I hope that, in future, our penalties for antisocial behaviour can be reviewed annually instead of every 20 years. The penalty level that the order brings in is to reflect inflation. As I said in my opening remarks, it would be about £68 if it were to be brought up to reflect inflation over the period from 2005 to 2026, which is why we have determined that it should now be £70.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

The number of penalties that have been paid has been stable over the past 10 years, with around eight in 10 being paid in full. That proportion has remained broadly consistent with inflation, even though the penalty itself has reduced in real value over time. Collection of penalties is a matter for the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, and it has operational independence in doing so. I do not have specific figures with me, but I will be happy to write to the committee on that point.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

My understanding is that they are not, but Robert might have something further on that.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

That issue has not been raised with me by Police Scotland, but it may have raised it in conversations with Robert.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

I have no further comments to make. I move,

That the Criminal Justice Committee recommends that the Antisocial Behaviour (Fixed Penalty Notice) (Miscellaneous Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2026 [draft] be approved.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Siobhian Brown

They have not been used for those offences in the past year.