- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the finding of the report endorsed by the British Sleep Society, Dead Tired, whether it considers that a total 20 minutes teaching per student on sleep disorders is satisfactory and, if not, what steps it will take to ensure that a greater amount of teaching time is given to such disorders.
Answer
The responsibility fordetermining the educational requirements for all medical undergraduates restswith the General Medical Council (GMC).
The GMC is the regulatorybody which determines the content of the courses and decides the standard ofexpertise to maintained.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, with reference to page 4, paragraph 8, of the report from the Expert Advisory Group on Infertility Services in Scotland, Evidence & Equity, published in April 1999, infertility due to cancer treatment would be an appropriate diagnosed cause.
Answer
Evidence and Equity, the report of the Expert Advisory Group onInfertility Services in Scotland (EAGISS), states that NHS funded assistedconception should be available to couples who meet all of the relevanteligibility criteria, including:
“Couples with infertilityof a diagnosed cause (of any duration) for which assisted conception representseffective treatment” (p17).
Infertility as a result ofcancer treatment would generally be considered as an appropriate diagnosedcause. However it would be for the lead consultant in each individual case todecide whether treatment would be appropriate.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what research has been undertaken into the (a) scale (b) effects and (c) cost of sleep disorders, in light of the recommendations of the report endorsed by the British Sleep Society, Dead Tired.
Answer
No research has been commissionedby the Executive as a direct result of this report. The Chief Scientist Officeof the Scottish Executive Health Department is currently funding one Edinburgh Universityresearch project, “Screening for Sleep Apnoea/Hypoponoea Syndrome and drivingimpairment in professional drivers”.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps will be taken to introduce guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of all sleep disorders, in light of the finding of the report endorsed by the British Sleep Society, Dead Tired, that there are 84 sleep disorders.
Answer
There are no plans to takeany action directly related to this report. However, the ScottishIntercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), which is funded by the Executivethrough NHS Quality Improvement Scotland to produce good practice clinicalguidelines, published a guideline on the management of Obstructive SleepApnoea/Hypopnoea Syndrome (OSAHS) in September 2003. OSAHS is the most commonsleep disorder with a treatable medical cause, and the one which is believed tobe a factor in a significant number of traffic accidents. Copies of SIGNguidelines are available through the Parliament’s Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether interim funding can be provided to projects such as In Touch in Galashiels whose funding will end prior to the conclusion of the New Futures Fund.
Answer
Scottish Enterprise andHighlands & Islands Enterprise are currently funding a range of projects inphase 2 of NFF. The contracts for a small number of projects, including “InTouch”, are due to end in March 2004. We are considering, with the EnterpriseNetworks, the scope for additional, or alternative sources of funding in order tobring these in line with the rest of the programme.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 26 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 9 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive when the pay modernisation team looking at the impact of the general medical services and consultant contracts is expected to report and whether the report will include consideration of any retrospective implications for NHS boards.
Answer
The pay modernisation teamis co-ordinating a wide range of work at local and national level to aid theimplementation of the general medical services and consultants’ contract and tohelp oversee delivery of the contracts and their impact. This is an on-goingprocess taken forward through a number of strands and involving regular updatesand advice on implementation and its consequences. This work does involveconsideration of retrospective implications.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 6 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-158 by Mr Jim Wallace on 3 June 2003, how much has been received by each further education college for social inclusion in each of the years referred to (a) excluding any funding attributable to the location of the college being in a rural area and (b) expressed also as a percentage of each college's budget.
Answer
The information requested is as follows:
College | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 |
| Total specific social inclusion element | % specific social inclusion to core allocation | Total specific social inclusion element | % specific social inclusion to core allocation | Total specific social inclusion element | % specific social inclusion to core allocation |
Aberdeen College | £115,257 | 0.75% | £279,914 | 1.73% | £313,326 | 1.87% |
Angus College | £27,786 | 0.65% | £49,375 | 1.05% | £50,976 | 1.05% |
Anniesland College | £256,365 | 4.95% | £504,858 | 8.90% | £530,400 | 9.10% |
Ayr College | £82,338 | 1.46% | £194,423 | 3.08% | £228,091 | 3.52% |
Banff and Buchan College of Further Education | £819 | 0.02% | £1,818 | 0.04% | £2,341 | 0.05% |
The Barony College | £8,871 | 0.70% | £10,018 | 0.71% | £11,167 | 0.78% |
Borders College | £957 | 0.02% | £3,737 | 0.09% | £2,849 | 0.07% |
Cardonald College | £256,339 | 3.38% | £507,839 | 6.09% | £549,134 | 6.29% |
Central College of Commerce | £134,295 | 2.92% | £312,708 | 6.70% | £383,692 | 7.82% |
Clackmannan College of Further Education | £39,253 | 1.54% | £71,797 | 2.58% | £71,157 | 2.51% |
Clydebank College | £210,907 | 3.32% | £352,497 | 5.51% | £362,290 | 5.54% |
Coatbridge College | £120,543 | 3.13% | £249,642 | 6.01% | £277,925 | 6.54% |
Cumbernauld College | £25,657 | 0.81% | £60,515 | 1.82% | £85,598 | 2.53% |
Dumfries and Galloway College | £36,736 | 0.82% | £78,953 | 1.69% | £87,414 | 1.87% |
Dundee College | £270,339 | 2.63% | £522,863 | 4.45% | £607,668 | 4.97% |
Edinburgh's Telford College | £198,813 | 1.52% | £395,741 | 2.92% | £436,261 | 3.13% |
Elmwood College | £8,072 | 0.24% | £16,130 | 0.44% | £21,046 | 0.55% |
Falkirk College of Further and Higher Education | £92,192 | 1.05% | £181,450 | 1.89% | £207,886 | 2.05% |
Fife College of Further and Higher Education | £112,473 | 1.58% | £244,891 | 3.10% | £266,292 | 3.24% |
Glasgow College of Building & Printing | £139,200 | 2.11% | £313,173 | 4.51% | £356,887 | 4.89% |
Glasgow College of Food Technology | £91,455 | 2.97% | £273,557 | 7.89% | £258,752 | 7.23% |
Glasgow College of Nautical Studies | £119,644 | 3.04% | £208,757 | 5.03% | £250,934 | 5.78% |
Glenrothes College | £32,944 | 0.64% | £80,217 | 1.46% | £94,603 | 1.66% |
Inverness College | £20,621 | 0.34% | £40,335 | 0.82% | £41,912 | 0.81% |
James Watt College of Further and Higher Education | £281,725 | 2.05% | £771,276 | 4.58% | £781,620 | 4.48% |
Jewel and Esk Valley College | £79,881 | 1.12% | £151,101 | 1.97% | £164,458 | 2.09% |
John Wheatley College | £272,332 | 7.07% | £342,172 | 7.93% | £406,437 | 8.97% |
Kilmarnock College | £87,962 | 1.54% | £227,707 | 3.85% | £255,300 | 4.17% |
Langside College | £179,501 | 2.71% | £387,034 | 6.04% | £433,678 | 7.28% |
Lauder College | £50,681 | 0.90% | £104,890 | 1.71% | £144,578 | 2.30% |
Lews Castle College | £154 | 0.01% | £333 | 0.02% | £524 | 0.04% |
Moray College | £2,695 | 0.06% | £4,308 | 0.13% | £2,687 | 0.08% |
Motherwell College | £211,157 | 2.56% | £445,416 | 4.69% | £528,230 | 5.40% |
North Glasgow College | £114,838 | 2.29% | £311,894 | 5.53% | £385,984 | 6.57% |
Oatridge Agricultural College | £7,947 | 0.45% | £11,414 | 0.63% | £17,139 | 0.90% |
Perth College | £23,560 | 0.43% | £33,381 | 0.79% | £33,597 | 0.79% |
Reid Kerr College | £204,736 | 2.47% | £473,557 | 5.06% | £506,320 | 5.29% |
South Lanarkshire College | £52,604 | 1.38% | £108,815 | 2.68% | £112,477 | 2.67% |
Stevenson College Edinburgh | £174,005 | 1.57% | £350,942 | 3.27% | £309,010 | 3.12% |
Stow College | £153,122 | 2.84% | £248,674 | 4.50% | £301,584 | 5.18% |
The North Highland College | £2,006 | 0.07% | £4,275 | 0.17% | £9,148 | 0.35% |
West Lothian College | £33,116 | 0.83% | £73,292 | 1.39% | £95,256 | 1.84% |
Orkney College | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% |
Shetland College of Further Education | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% |
Source: Scottish FurtherEducation Funding Council.
Notes:
1.The social inclusion elements are shown as a percentage of the core formulafunding allocation to colleges. This represents the majority of fundingallocated to colleges by the Scottish Further Education Funding Council(SFEFC). It excludes other SFEFC funding outwith the core formula. This caninclude claims based grants (e.g. fee waiver); funding to support students'living costs which is not core teaching activity; one off funds paid tocolleges for specific projects; and funds paid to other bodies to support thework of colleges. To include funds such as these in the comparison would bemisleading as much of the funding cannot be split by college and/or isconceptually different to core funding.
2. There has been somedebate over the basis on which the social inclusion elements of college fundingare calculated. The element which supports entry costs and retention aretriggered in respect of students living in Scotland’s 20% most deprivedpostcodes, which are generally in urban areas. SFEFC is currently reviewing howthe funding methodology takes account of remoteness.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 6 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how much each region has received from the European Regional Development Fund, broken down by individual project.
Answer
In the current 2000-06European Structural Funds Scottish programmes, European Regional DevelopmentFunding (ERDF) is available in the Highlands and Islands Special TransitionalProgramme and in the east of Scotland, south of Scotland and western Scotland objective2 programmes. Individual projects receiving ERDF grants under these programmes aredetailed in European Regional Development Fund Awarded by Individual Projectas at January 2004, a copy of which has been placed in the Scottish ParliamentInformation Centre (Bib. number 30800).
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 5 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether retrospective applications can be made to the European Regional Development Fund and, if so, which projects have successfully so applied.
Answer
Retrospective applicationsare normally not permitted for European Structural Funds. However in 2003, withthe Commission’s approval, some projects in the current 2000-2006 Objective 2East of Scotland and Western Scotland programmes were allowed toclaim funding retrospectively, in consideration of the delay to the start of the programmes.
A full list of approvedretrospective project information is given in List of Projects that Appliedfor ERDF funding Retrospectively in 2003, a copy of which has been placedin the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 30799).
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 4 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how much funding from the European Regional Development Fund remains unallocated, broken down by region.
Answer
In the current 2000-06European Structural Funds Scottish Programmes, the total
European RegionalDevelopment Fund (ERDF) grant remaining unallocated is detailed below.
Scotland 2000-2006 Programme | Unallocated ERDF Funding (grant) As at January 2004 |
Highlands and Islands Special Transition Programme | £55,950,675 |
South of Scotland Objective 2 | £19,806,907 |
East of Scotland Objective 2 | £56,998,361 |
Western Scotland Objective 2 | £144,700,000 |
Urban II | £4,000,000 |