- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 29 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its proposed Deposit Return Scheme, whether it will provide the detailed calculations for how each of the figures were arrived at as set out in Table 3 on page (a) 15 of A Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland: Full Business and Regulatory Impact, published in July 2019 and (b) 20 of the Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA), published in December 2021, in particular in relation to the (i) costs and (ii) benefits for (A) local authorities, (B) business, (C) the regulator, (D) the system operator and (E) society.
Answer
The economic model underlying the analysis in the amended Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA) for Scotland's Deposit Return Scheme was developed in line with best practice by Zero Waste Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Government. The key inputs to the model are set out at table 2 of the amended Final BRIA.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 29 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its proposed Deposit Return Scheme, what its position is on (a) the estimates by Circularity Scotland that (i) 2.7 billion items would require to be recycled, (ii) 37,000 return points are needed and (iii) 6,000 Reverse Vending Machines are required and (b) whether its conclusion, as set out in Annex F, paragraph 5, page 152 of the Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA), published in December 2021, stating that “We remain committed to the assumptions set out in Table 3 as our final and best, estimate of the costs and benefits” remains valid, and what information it has on the position of Circularity Scotland regarding the figures used by the Scottish Government in Table 2 on page 19 of the Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA), published in December 2021.
Answer
As set out in Annex F to the amended Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA) for our Deposit Return Scheme (DRS), published on 15 December 2021, we consider that there is a degree of uncertainty attached to the figures proposed by Circularity Scotland Ltd (CSL) for the number of scheme articles and return points under DRS. For that reason our final and best estimate remains that set out on p19 of the amended BRIA.
Nevertheless, as Annex F shows, even if we were to adopt these two figures there would continue to be a strong economic case for DRS.
We have seen no evidence for higher numbers of RVMs than the roughly 3,000 assumed in the Full Business Case Addendum and I understand that CSL is continuing to work from this figure. That is therefore the figure modelled in the updated Final BRIA that was published in December last year.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 29 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its estimates as set out in the Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA), published in December 2021, and as contained in Annex F: Industry Assumptions, whether specific allowance is made for the additional costs of approximately 3,000 Reverse Vending Machines (RVM), as referred to in table 2 on page 19 of the same document, and, if this is not the case, what its position is on whether the 2021 BRIA is defective.
Answer
As Table 2 of the amended final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA) for our Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) makes clear, the economic modelling in the BRIA assumes that there will be 3,021 reverse vending machines (RVMs) in operation.
Annex F of the amended final BRIA shows that the economic case for DRS remains strong if higher numbers of containers and return points, suggested by industry, are adopted. As we have seen no evidence for higher numbers of RVMs than 3,021, this is also the figure modelled in Annex F.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its proposed Deposit Return Scheme, what consideration (a) it and (b) Circularity Scotland has given to the potential impact on distributers and wholesalers in Scotland of a need for two separate SKU’s (Stock Keeping Units), in particular in relation to (i) cost and (ii) space implications, in light of the plans for separate labelling requirements for Scotland and the rest of the UK.
Answer
Stock keeping arrangements related to Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) are a matter for industry to determine; our Regulations do not mandate a separate Scottish label or barcode for in-scope containers.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the proposed Deposit Return Scheme may contravene the provisions on non-discrimination of goods, which are included in the UK Internal Market Act 2020.
Answer
We are analysing the text of the Act to understand how it could interact with Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme (DRS), but in order to assess impact fully we need to understand the UK Government’s intentions for its own DRS. We have not yet seen their response to their recent consultation.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the comments, regarding potential benefits for industry from its Deposit Return Scheme, by the Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity at the meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 25 January 2022, that the scheme "will generate about £600 million a year" and that "there is a lot of money to be made", whether it will provide a detailed breakdown of this figure in terms of any potential benefits to industry, and how precisely any such benefits will arise.
Answer
The figure is based on Circularity Scotland Ltd’s assessment of its expected annual turnover as scheme administrator once it is in steady state.
We anticipate that implementation and operation of DRS will generate a range of business and employment opportunities in the extensive infrastructure and logistics required for the scheme, for example in the construction and operating of sorting and bulking centres.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its proposed Deposit Return Scheme, whether wholesalers will be permitted during the course of their normal delivery schedule to use the same lorries and vans for back haul of the collection, and uplift of glass bottles, plastic containers and aluminium tins; whether SEPA has been asked to provide advice on this matter, and, if so, when (a) it was first asked to do so and (b) the advice will be published.
Answer
Since July 2021 SEPA has advised that the same vehicle that is used for delivery can be used for the backhaul of scheme packaging provided that:
- the haulier is a registered waste carrier ;
- where backhaul is carried out in a vehicle used to transport fresh food, there is sufficient separation and a barrier to prevent contamination of waste materials with organic matter.
This advice was published as part of a series of DRS Frequently Asked Questions on SEPA’s website on 8 March 2022.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its plans to include glass packaging in a Deposit Return Scheme, whether it has considered the impact on overall glass recycling rates of splitting glass into two waste streams for material collected manually and using reverse vending machines.
Answer
Section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 requires those handling waste to ensure that it is handled in a fashion that promotes high-value recycling.
Return points, producers and Circularity Scotland, when handling returned scheme packaging, including glass, will therefore have an obligation to promote high-value recycling regardless of whether the glass is collected manually or by the use of reverse vending machines.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many businesses in the SME sector it anticipates will cease doing business in Scotland as a result of any additional costs of compliance with the proposed Deposit Return Scheme, such as the bar code and labelling requirements.
Answer
Participation of small producers is vital to the success of the scheme and we believe we have taken their needs into consideration in designing DRS.
We have consulted extensively with businesses of all sizes that will be affected by the implementation of Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme. We are not aware that any producers have decided to cease doing business in Scotland, although we are aware that some have expressed concerns about whether they will continue to sell their products in Scotland.
This is one of the reasons why we have applied a de minimis for the SEPA registration fee. This will remove a cost for businesses operating below the current VAT threshold, benefiting around 1,600 of the more than 4,000 anticipated producers selling into the Scottish market
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the comment by the Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity at the meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 25 January 2022 that "Circularity Scotland intends the reverse vending machines [RVMs] that it advises businesses to install to be compatible with future digital schemes", which includes a digital deposit return scheme, whether this requirement will be mandatory on the part of businesses; what extra costs that will entail to each business in relation to the most recent estimated cost of a minimum of £19,000 per machine; what steps it took to ascertain the cost impacts of requiring businesses to purchase or lease RVMs that are compatible in this way; what checking it undertook regarding whether it is possible to obtain RVMs that are compatible, and what choice there is of RVMs that have this compatibility that will ensure that competition applies in the RMV market.
Answer
Return Point operators are responsible for ensuring that the Reverse Vending Machines (RVM) that they use meet the specifications supplied by the Scheme Administrator, Circularity Scotland Ltd (CSL).
The costs of operating a Return Point, including the RVM, is offset by the Retail Handling Fee paid by CSL to Return Point operators per in-scope container they process.