- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 18 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will detail any areas of disagreement that arose between it and Her Majesty's Government during the December meeting of the EU Fisheries Council.
Answer
An agreed UK line was adopted on all issues raised at the December Fisheries Council. The Executive contributed fully to the development of the agreed UK position.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 18 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what representations it made to Her Majesty's Government during the December meeting of the EU Fisheries Council, what response it received and what the outcome was of its representations.
Answer
The Executive was fully involved in working-up the UK line across the whole range of issues raised by the UK team at the December Council.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 16 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what the implications for the Scottish economy are of the Large Combustion Plant Directive.
Answer
As negotiations on the proposal to amend the Large Combustion Plants Directive have only reached the Common Position stage, it is not possible to gauge accurately the costs to the Scottish economy of the proposal until the final text is agreed and adopted by the Council and the European Parliament. This is expected to occur in the second half of 2001. However the Common Position included the option of a national plan approach for "existing plant" (i.e. plant licensed prior to July 1987) rather than the mandatory application of emission limit values to each individual plant. The national plan approach could provide the option of more flexibility in implementing the Directive through controlling emissions where it is most cost-effective to do so.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 16 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what representations it has made to (a) Her Majesty's Government and (b) the European Commission, regarding any implications for the offshore industry of the Large Combustion Plant Directive; whether it has been consulted about any such implications, and, if so, by whom and what its response was.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has played a full part in the negotiations to date on all aspects of the proposed revisions to the Large Combustion Plant Directive and has been in regular contact with the UK Government and the European Commission as negotiations have developed. Under the Common Position adopted by the Council in November 2000, the Directive would not apply to plants used on off-shore platforms. This was also the case in the European Commission's original proposal for a revision to the Directive. We will continue to monitor the progress of the proposed revision and play a full part in the remaining stages of the negotiating process.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 15 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how much was spent by each local authority on supply teaching staff for each of the last three years.
Answer
I have today sent the Convenor of the Education, Culture and Sport Committee a report on the supply of teachers. A response to your specific question can be found at paragraphs 39-45 of the report.Copies of the report have been placed in the Parliament's Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 15 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what the number of teaching staff was for (a) primary and (b) secondary schools by local authority area for each of the last three years, including the figures for this year.
Answer
I have today sent the Convenor of the Education, Culture and Sport Committee a report on the supply of teachers. A response to your specific question can be found at Annex F of the report.Copies of the report have been placed in the Parliament's Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 12 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what powers it has in relation to consumer protection matters.
Answer
The position is set out in Schedule 5, C7 of the Scotland Act 1998.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 9 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of NHS owned medical equipment (a) in each NHS Trust and (b) Scotland is beyond its standard life.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-10616.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 9 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how much it would cost to replace medical equipment deemed to be beyond its standard life in (a) each NHS Trust and (b) Scotland.
Answer
Details of NHS Trust medical equipment replacement programmes are not held centrally.
The Executive is committed to increasing the monies available for capital expenditure in the NHS in Scotland to improve equipment and facilities to improve patient care.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus MacKay on 9 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive by what percentage the budget of each of its Departments increased as a result of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), and what percentage of any additional funds made available by the CSR increase each Department received.
Answer
I refer to the following table. For ease this is set out in a similar format to Table 1 in
Making a Difference for Scotland.
Table 1: Increased budgets by Portfolio as a % of 2000-01 budget and increase in 2003-04 as % of total increase1
Programme | % change in each portfolio budget from 2000-01 to 2003-04 | Additional funds received by portfolio in 2003-04 as a % of total increased funding over 2000-01 to 2003-04 |
Central Government | | |
Justice | 21.5 | 3.1 |
Crown Office | 19.7 | 0.3 |
NHS | 23.4 | 34.3 |
Community Care | 596.2 | 0.3 |
Food Standards | 45.0 | 0.0 |
Transport | 56.2 | 4.5 |
Environment | 10.4 | 1.0 |
Rural Affairs | 10.8 | 0.6 |
Forestry Commission | 4.8 | 0.0 |
Enterprise and Lifelong Learning | 15.3 | 7.7 |
Education, Arts, Sport & Culture | 25.8 | 3.2 |
Communities | 29.2 | 5.1 |
Administration and associated departments | 9.7 | 0.5 |
European Funds | 2.6 | 0.1 |
Total Central Government | 21.8 | 60.9 |
Total Local Government | 20.3 | 33.1 |
Of which: | | |
LA Capital | 68.7 | 6.7 |
LA Current | 17.2 | 26.3 |
TOTAL ANNUALLY MANAGED EXPENDITURE | 12.7 | 6.2 |
TOTAL MANAGED EXPENDITURE | 20.4 | 100.0 |
1The table only covers main SE Portfolios and excludes figures for Scottish Parliament and Audit Scotland, Capital Modernisation Fund and Reserve.