- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 15 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any external finance limits were undershot for the last financial year by public bodies within its responsibility and, if so, by which bodies.
Answer
I refer you to the answer to question S1W-9428.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 15 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any external finance limits were overshot by public bodies within its responsibility for the last financial year and, if so, by which bodies and what action was taken in response.
Answer
The table below details the 1999-2000 budget and outturn figures for those public sector bodies that are set external financing limits:
| Budget | £000 Outturn |
National Health Service Trusts | 52,026 | 52,028 |
Highland and Islands Airports Ltd | 12,700 | 12,300 |
Caledonian MacBrayne | 24,400 | 21,400 |
Scottish Enterprise | 372,769 | 372,769 |
Highlands and Island Enterprise | 65,390 | 65,390 |
Scottish Water Authorities | 221,900 | 221,900 |
National Health Service Trusts EFL for 2000-01 will compensate for the overshoot in 1999-2000.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 July 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 14 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it intends to make any representations to the water authorities in relation to the current review of the level of relief from water and wastewater charges granted to certain organisations and what its policy is on the continuation of such relief.
Answer
The water authorities are conducting a consultation exercise on proposals to withdraw relief on water and sewerage charges from certain customers. The exercise follows my intervention last year to delay for one year the withdrawal of relief in a number of cases. As part of that intervention, I required any further proposals of this type to be the subject of consultation with all customers that might be affected. The current consultation exercise is in line with that requirement.
Under the Local Government etc (Scotland) Act 1994, the water authorities are required to endeavour not to show any undue preference or discrimination in respect of particular groups of customers. It is against this background that the authorities are conducting the present consultation exercise. The Executive believes that where reliefs are to be withdrawn, withdrawal should be phased to ease the immediate impact and those customers affected by withdrawal should be given sufficient warning so that they can make plans to meet increased bills.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 September 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 14 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress is being made in helping low income households pay their water charges.
Answer
The Executive is currently considering whether it can improve on the assistance provided to many low income households through the link between water and sewerage charges and council tax bands. I expect to publish a consultation paper on this shortly.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 September 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 13 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are any circumstances under which local authorities are required to transport children to school free of charge.
Answer
Under section 51 of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980, education authorities have a duty to make such arrangements as they consider necessary for the provision of free transport, or for provision of other transport facilities as may be arranged, or for paying all or part of reasonable transport expenses for school pupils belonging to their area and attending designated schools. The details of any arrangements made are for each education authority to determine in the light of local circumstances. In general, they make such arrangements for pupils who live outwith the statutory walking distance, defined in section 42(4) of the 1980 Act as being two miles for any pupil under eight years of age and three miles for any other pupil.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 12 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-8781 by Mr Jim Wallace on 7 August 2000, how many of the accused subject to the orders referred to committed one or more subsequent crimes while on bail and whether any were bailed for a second time.
Answer
It is not possible to provide the level of detail requested from the information held centrally. The table below gives figures for the number of persons with a charge proved in sheriff and district courts in North East Scotland in 1997 and 1998, and the number of these where the main offence involved was aggravated by having been committed while the offender was on bail. Corresponding information for 1999 is not yet available.
Persons with a charge proved, North East Scotland1, 1997-98
SEJD Crime Category2 | All persons | Persons with a bail aggravation3 |
1997 | 1998 | 1997 | 1998 |
Housebreaking | 495 | 466 | 89 | 72 |
Robbery | 28 | 36 | 5 | 4 |
Drug offences | 833 | 817 | 21 | 46 |
Other offences | 13,871 | 14,246 | 526 | 549 |
Total | 15,227 | 15,565 | 641 | 671 |
Notes:
1. Aberdeen, Banff, Elgin, Peterhead and Stonehaven Sheriff Courts; Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire and Moray District Courts.
2. Main offence
3. The offence was aggravated by having been committed while the offender was the subject of a bail order.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 12 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive to what extent a level of anticipated discards at sea is taken into account when deciding annual quotas.
Answer
Decisions on the size of quotas are based on scientific advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES). The ICES advice proposes sustainable levels of fishing for the forthcoming year and takes into account the estimated level of discarding from the previous year for key commercial species.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 12 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it has taken to reduce discarding of fish at sea and what its policy is on this issue.
Answer
The Executive is committed to reducing discards of all species. The new EC Technical Conservation Regulation, which came into force on 1 January this year, introduced new measures to reduce discarding. Furthermore, the Scottish Executive recently made regulations requiring the placement of square mesh panels in fishing nets as from 3 August and a reduction in net twine thickness applicable from March next year. These measures will reduce discards of juvenile haddock and whiting.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 12 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what level of fish it estimates has been discarded by fishermen at sea for each of the last three years.
Answer
Levels of discards are estimated by fish species and sea area. These estimates are given in the Annual Report of the Advisory Committee on Fishery Management. The data below provides the estimated discard rates for the Scottish fleet for the main whitefish species by weight aggregated over the entire North Sea.
| 1997 | 1998 | 1999 |
Cod | 18.56% | 22.98% | 11.81% |
Haddock | 40.30% | 37.58% | 40.66% |
Whiting | 35.92% | 35.03% | 48.15% |
My department has to rely on data provided by fishermen to supplement estimates provided by our scientists.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 21 August 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 11 September 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what measures are being taken to assist fishermen in relation to the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2000 and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No.2) (Scotland) Order 2000.
Answer
My answer to question S1W-9281 confirms the Scottish Executive's position on compensation and possible assistance for the scallop sector through the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) programme.
In February this year, I introduced a relaxation to licensing and quota management provisions to allow certain vessels with Category C licences which were affected by the scallop fishery closures to fish for West of Scotland nephrops until the end of August.
In view of the most recent closures off the west coast, I have decided to extend this relaxation to the end of the year.